Welcome to the ToyDemon Forum.

Back to store

  • Home
  • Help
  • Search

 
Get The Latest News About Deals & Sales On ToyDemon
  • ? ToyDemon Forum
  • ? ToyDemon Lounge
  • ? Product Reviews
  • Magic Eyes Neotenic Fairy
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Magic Eyes Neotenic Fairy  (Read 6701 times)

Offline Timmy Tucker

  • Jr. Demon
  • **
  • Posts: 56

    Props: 7

Magic Eyes Neotenic Fairy
« on: November 29, 2017, 05:24:55 PM »
https://www.toydemon.com/neotenic-fairy-onahole-masturbator

As requested by Sonic Boom I will attempt to review.

I'm not particularly good at doing this but since he was interested here goes. Initial impressions are it's fantastic. Maybe not for everyone but for me it's a solid purchase. The unique thing is the layering. The white outside layer is a firmer version of the magic eyes skin they use on their other onaholes. It's harder than say the ZXY yet softer and more pliable than the Cherry 2. So we're talking a good firm outer shell but able to give and stretch. Not to be confused with hard at all. It feels nice in the hand (and on the shaft). The red second layer is softer and similar to the normal Magic Eyes outer layer. Sort of similar to the ZXY and other toys in the category. You can see it on the end of the toy opposite from the opening. The pink inner layer is softer still.  It's not crazy soft where you can't feel it at all but the layers are gradually softer. The tunnel length is sufficient for 6-7 inches comfortably. Anyone longer is going to start bulging the end. But that's typical. I don't think it's an issue any more so than other toys.

What the layering does is the outer opening is fairly tight so it grips you around the shaft with the firmer layer. The lips are rounded so entrance isn't that difficult IMO. It helps to compress the inner layers as well to make it squeeze you as you push through. If you were particularly girthy this might be a little annoying. But I don't think so. Especially after you get inserted initially. It's wide enough and stretches well enough that I don't think it would be uncomfortable. Great lube is a must IMO no matter what toy. But the opening is a consideration if you're large. There isn't anything specific about the insides that strikes me from the first use. Other than it just feels good. It's not over stimulating IMO but not quite a slick tunnel either. There are additional "lips" that add to the initial grip but with a softer touch that stands out.

I think it looks nice but Magic Eyes doesn't really make realistic openings. Turned over so that you're seeing the "ass" it's a nicer look IMO. Slightly different feel as well. The heft of the toy is toward the bottom side though like most toys.

The size is unique to anything else I have. It's bigger than my largest sleeve. But smaller than the Cherry 2 or Poco Pen. Sort of a mini- mini- hip if you will. It's pretty much a two hander if sitting etc. or you can use it on a surface or on top of it if you aren't too rough with it.

Cleaning is... well cleaning. As those things go it isn't any worse than other toys. Probably a little easier if I'm splitting hairs. Nobody likes that part though.

I always am concerned with durability with these multi-layer toys. But there weren't any initial problems that I can see.

My one complaint is the box art. And I really don't care about the box. Some people do and some people will love the pre pubescent girl on the box. It's a little creepy to me. So I'll throw it out and just keep the inner plastic shell to store it in another box.

So to wrap it up I really like it. I think it's different. It really does combine some of the best parts of the stiffer toys and the softer toys. But it's still a rubber snatch and there's only so much they can do to change up the feel. If you don't have anything like this and you're wanting something "new" like I was then this is for you. Especially if you have the $100 or so to give it a whirl and a sizable collection of other things you like.

If you have questions let me know and I'll try to answer. Hope this helps those who are interested.
Logged

Offline SonicBoom

  • Sr. Demon
  • ****
  • Posts: 303

    Props: 77

Re: Magic Eyes Neotenic Fairy
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2017, 08:21:49 PM »
Great review Timmy Tucker, I really appreciate the effort on my behalf!  It really does sound interesting and in concept similar to another two-handed toy called the Hanjuku (https://www.toydemon.com/hanjuku)

I tried the Hanjuku because of the interesting concept and the "9" inner softness rating, as I really like extra soft toys.  Unfortunately, I didn't care for it as the outer harder layer caused too much of a choke point at the entrance.  It was really tight, but so much so that I couldn't feel anything else.

The Neotenic Fairy doesn't list a softness rating.  How soft would you judge the inner layer to be?  Or what toys does it compare to?  I am seriously considering trying this out, but I've been disappointed by a lot of purchases and I've gotten a little hesitant.  I greatly appreciate any answers you can provide.  Thanks again for doing this!

SB
Logged

Offline Timmy Tucker

  • Jr. Demon
  • **
  • Posts: 56

    Props: 7

Re: Magic Eyes Neotenic Fairy
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2017, 11:13:00 PM »
Looking at that I'd say you're probably right that they are very similar. Same idea at least. They look almost identical except for the colors and interior textures. I might have to give that a try next time. I would say the third layer is the biggest difference. The entrance on the neotenic is almost an inch deep before you get past the exterior shell to the softer material. But it does sort of open up some rather than tightening down as the tunnel progresses. So like 2 inches in you get past the second and third set of inner lips (the third isn't exactly lips but for lack of a better word) which are sort of smooth. Which is probably less stimulating. Then you get some textures but it isn't as tight so it's not overwhelming. As opposed to the description of the Hanjuku which says "spiraling inward while increasing in tightness". That sounds like it gets tighter as it goes and might increase stimulation. So that might be another difference. I'm not a huge fan of stimulation overload. I'm more into the right pressure which is what that outer shell really gave this toy that nothing else has had. Other toys have had inner rings or have been anal sleeves etc. trying to produce this sensation I think. Like the anal entrance on the cherry 2 for example. The Sujiman Kupa Lolinco Virgo has sort of what I'm describing in sleeve form. https://www.toydemon.com/sujiman-kupa-lolinco-virgo-onahole-masturbator But this toy has done it better IMO if that's what you're looking for and like.

As far as softness goes? There's not a huge difference in softness between this inner layer and the ZXY. I don't know how they rate these. They aren't very consistent though. They have the cherry 2 and the ZXY the same. That's crazy talk. The outer layer is the key difference in this toy but the 3 layer design does maybe give it more of a "muscle tone" feel to it? If that even makes sense. So it's initially soft but as you press into it you get a firmer and firmer sensation. So as you go in it's really soft straight down the tunnel but if you were to angle down into it you get more resistance. Part of that is because of the outer shell but some of that is the inner second layer I think as well. It's a different toy than the other sleeves and hips I've had so it's hard to compare to those exactly. I suspect you'd have a similar reaction to the neotenic as you did the hanjuku. I think the insides are great but the star of this show is the combining of that harder shell with a softer insides. I hate to use the word hard but for you that's probably the right word.

Did you consider the insides of the hanjuku to be a 9? That's like softest toy ever land. If so then this isn't as soft. It's soft. Between a 6.5 and an 8 compared to ZXY, Sujiman, and Poco Pen. Which are toys I've owned. We should develop a test to determine it objectively. This guessing based on our subjective opinion sort of sucks. Not quite as bad as their scale but still bad.  :-\

I probably just made you more confused. If you have other toys you enjoy wait until next year and I'll probably buy the Hanjuku and I can compare them for you. And if my opinion changes any on this in the coming days, weeks, months I'll update as well. I've had other toys that both got better and worse after multiple uses. I think it's a really great toy but that's an early impression and obviously different strokes for different folks as the saying goes.

Logged

Offline Timmy Tucker

  • Jr. Demon
  • **
  • Posts: 56

    Props: 7

Re: Magic Eyes Neotenic Fairy
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2017, 06:54:21 PM »
I was looking at the Hanjuku again and noticed it's significantly smaller than the Neotenic. Which is a full pound heavier. I don't know if that would matter much but there is a significant size difference. I missed that the first time through looking.

Edited for clarity.
« Last Edit: November 30, 2017, 11:30:51 PM by Timmy Tucker »
Logged

Offline SonicBoom

  • Sr. Demon
  • ****
  • Posts: 303

    Props: 77

Re: Magic Eyes Neotenic Fairy
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2017, 05:32:54 PM »
Thanks for the detailed response!  That was really helpful and exactly what I was hoping for. 

Quote from: Timmy Tucker on November 29, 2017, 11:13:00 PM
Did you consider the insides of the hanjuku to be a 9? That's like softest toy ever land. If so then this isn't as soft. It's soft. Between a 6.5 and an 8 compared to ZXY, Sujiman, and Poco Pen. Which are toys I've owned. We should develop a test to determine it objectively. This guessing based on our subjective opinion sort of sucks. Not quite as bad as their scale but still bad.  :-\

So it sounds like this toy is probably too hard for me.  Oh well, thanks for the info anyway, you probably saved me from some disappointment at least.

And I completely agree about finding a softness scale that works.  However, the problem with coming up with an objective test is inventing one that everyone can apply.  That's one of the reasons I greatly appreciate TD including their softness rating in the specs, as it gives us a ballpark reference at the very least and is better than nothing at all to compare to. 

If I could make one recommendation to TD it would be to specify the softness rating to outside layer/inside layer.  I think that's where some of the inconsistency in ratings is coming from.  Just speaking for myself, it's the inner layer softness rating that matters, not the outer.

For now I guess the best we can do is comparing to popular toys that a lot of us already have, like the ZXY. 

SB
Logged

Offline hermes

  • Jr. Demon
  • **
  • Posts: 94

    Props: 3

Re: Magic Eyes Neotenic Fairy
« Reply #5 on: December 25, 2018, 08:19:45 PM »
I like it. Not sure I like it better than Meiki Cherry (bought from Toy demon) or my cheapo from China. But probably. Those items of delight are stored elsewhere so I can't directly compare.

I give the Neotonic Fairy a thumbs up (so to speak). It appears that the dual layer construction has paid off. The little hip is substantial. The sensation inside and out is good. The scaled-down hip is portable.

However, as much as I like the not exactly hard but certainly not soft material, I tend to be unable to edge for more than an hour and so cum too soon compared to softer toys. The stimulation is indeed very good, but unlike say Fleshlight STU, well, it might be overstimulating. Not really a complaint however.

The camel toe vulva could have been done better. On mine there is a crease on each side of the inner thigh (maybe my packing error). And the exposed inner layer (red) which comprises the interior material is a bit beefy-meaty, so creepy for this vegetarian. Couldn't Magic Eyes have added a slight top layer to keep it the same *human* flesh colour?

My only real criticism is that after half a dozen sessions it already has splitting damage at the top and bottom of cavity. Oh, and I was surprised to discover that it's a one-holer (not a biggie for me). But they could add a gripping narrow uterus-like end to make it more exciting.

I much prefer this kind of design where the missing legs are replaced by rounded nothings rather than cut straight which I find repugnant.  One can hold the bottom of the tiny butt and rock it in one hand. It is a good design.

Ratings
 
pleasure: 8.5/10 (emotional 9/10, physical 8/10)
beauty: 7/10
durability: 5/10
price: 6/10

So, all round (not doing math, just ball-parking it for value): 7/10

*Update*: 2 months after purchase it is on its last non-legs. Soon it will be split asunder. And I am no giant. It still is functional but requires some gripping it together if I don't want a loose sensation (well, looser than before, not strictly speaking loose). I calculated the average number of uses per week, and my conclusion is that its intact-enough lifetime is under 30 uses for a typical Caucasian adult man. At the price I paid in Japan (JPY8100 = USD73) that is about two bucks per use. Is that a deal? I don't know. My Fleshlight is still intact after five (ten?) times that long. Thus, perhaps this size issue is a challenge for all Japanese products.
« Last Edit: February 20, 2019, 05:11:39 PM by hermes »
Logged

  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Buy Tomax exclusively at ToyDemon.com Meiki Toy Bags
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Stumbleupon
  • Twitter
  • Toydemon
  • Internet Explorer
  • Firefox
  • Google Chrome
Please use IE 7.0 or above for a better browsing experience on our site.

contact us legal Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy site map
Copyright © 2008-2016 ToyDemon.com